Major iPad Disruptions Coming

One of my first posts on this blog, was ‘Which Industries Did The iPad Disrupt?‘. I thought I was smart listing out a few industries here and there, but it never hit me just how huge the disruption of the iPad is really going to become, like this article from cultofmac titled ‘Why the iPad is the Most Hated Gadget Ever‘ suggests.

– Millions of toys might never be purchased
– Millions of tonnes of paper flight manuals won’t be printed
– Tens of millions of Netbooks won’t be made
– Millions of Restaurant menu’s will never be made as apps are developed and an iPad is shoved into the middle of the table.

The list goes on and go.

I for one, think this is a positive development. Yes, there will be lots of pain felt in these industries, and undoubtedly many layoffs, and while I feel for these people. This is the cost of human progress.

Short term pain = Long term gain.

Of course, that doesn’t mean people will see it that way, especially politicians but lets leave that subject alone for now. I am very exciting about the merger of all these industries into one device (maybe not just the iPad, but eventually other tablets too like Android. Monopolies suck).

Think of the efficiency gains that will be made, the energy savings, the millions of trees that won’t need to be cut down to make millions of flight manuals and hundreds of millions of books. The millions, perhaps billions of tons of oil that won’t need to be converted into plastic to create toys and cheap netbooks.

And of course, the cost savings. We all know money talks, and all else simply falls upon deaf ears. No wonder 92% of Fortune 500 companies are currently using the iPad, or testing it for potential deployment. That a lot of the top hospitals around the US are using iPads, and it is becoming an increasingly used tool in schools. It saves you money, both in terms of resources and huge time savings. Colour me impressed!

Now, think on the backend. The millions of toys and netbooks that we won’t have to throw away into overflowing landfills, contaminating our planet with chemicals. Of course, tablets might replace a part of that landfill, but any downhill movement in terms of pollution and waste is a win, and just a step on the way to zero waste.

The future is beginning to be realized, and I think it is going to be brighter than anyone of us can imagine. Yes, there will be huge pains on the way, especially economic pain, and social unrest resulting from this economic pain, but I have high hopes for the technology that will alleviate us from the woes of the 20th century.

How Are We Going To Feed Everyone?

Food security is a big deal nowadays. Everyone, most publicly the UN, is trying to fix it.

The UN is projecting that by 2050, there will be 9 billion people on this planet, while that 40% of todays arable land will disappear. This is a scary proposition and many countries around the world are actively implementing policies to get around the problem. The Chinese are buying up farm land all around the globe, as are Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE et al.

So where is all this extra food coming to come from? Well, there are many new exciting technologies / methodologies that are being done right now that will allow us to feed everyone with ease, and probably still have a huge surplus.

One technology that has me especially excited is the Omega Garden System. The Omega Garden System is an amazing little contraption. It works basically like this, the seedlings are planted around a cylindrical metal container that constantly rotates around a UV lamp in the centre. In this manner, all the plants growing get an even amount of UV light, something which does when growing on farmland. As the cylinder is constantly rotating, the plants are having to right themselves against gravity 24 hours a day, forcing them to use more nutrients and grow faster, stronger and more nutritious.

In this manner, the fruits & vegetables are grown in a fraction of the time, with a fraction of the water required (as none of it is wasted in the surrounding soil, as there is none) and a fraction of the space with none of the pesky insects either. If that’s not the future of food, then I don’t know what is.

Another example comes from the Netherlands, a company called Plantlab has created an entire underground farm lit up by the blue / red spectrum lights tailored to the plant itself, such that it instigates the fastest growth. It turns out that certain wavelengths of light are more effective than others in allowing plants to grow, and this farm aims to provide the perfect conditions in every respect in order to get us the food we need faster, with less energy used and no pesticides to boot. It looks almost like a night club save for the herbs and fruits everywhere. It also uses 90% less water than traditional above ground farming which is going to be a life saver in the not-to-distant future.

Above ground farming is surprisingly inefficient, from the water run off, soil depletion, beholden to nature’s cycles, inability to grow in the night, vast expanses of land and the need for all the machinery to plow, seed, and harvest. That’s all going to change with indoor and underground farming, and couldn’t come at a better time.

Pretty soon, we will be able to grow any type of food locally using climate controlled, 24/7 underground / indoor farms and save all that energy we currently use shipping exotic foods from one side of the planet to the other on other productive means. This is fascinating and I can’t wait for it to become widespread. City farms are starting to crop up in major cities around the world. My home city of Sydney is the next on the list to start installing city farms. Exciting stuff.

Why Doesn’t Ron Paul Get Any Love?

It’s fascinating watching the american media covering the Presidential race. Well, not so much fascinating as mind-blowing as its so blatantly obvious that the media is pulling their own agenda in regards to whom are eligible as the next candidates. As such, a candidate like Ron Paul gets next to no coverage whatsoever.

I believe the reason is, is that Ron Paul threatens the establishment. As is plainly obvious, the corporations of America have taken controlled of its government, and the way they did it was not hard at all. Bribery is legal, campaign donations are legal, and only come if the candidate or party they donate to propagate their viewpoints. This upper level of society has in a way usurped power from the democracy. Such as the military industrial complex, that FDR warned Americans about 50 years ago, that thrives on perpetual war. They will fight tooth and nail before any troops are ever called home. They make too much money from death and destruction to care about spending trillions of dollars that America doesn’t have. Like the food giants who make it ever difficult for small farmers to get their products to market, and use dangerous chemicals to streamline the food production system that threaten the lives of millions. Ron Paul threatens everything that doesn’t make sense, and that is why he gets no coverage at all.

Ron Paul’s mission is to cut the waste out of government. He wants to bring the troops home from Afghanistan and Iraq, and the 250,000 other troops stationed around the world for no reason. This costs a huge amount of money, and is no longer required. He wants to cut down on the size of the government, to only its essential functions and leave the rest to the private sector.

In a way, I understand why these corporations act the way they do. They act only in their own self-interest. Much as we all would. We act and do the things we do so that we can have a paycheck, food and a home etc. Except in their case, they are beholden to shareholders who demand more money than the last quarter. We, as humans always want more, and bigger or both. Notice how we keep building bigger cities, and taller buildings decade after decade, we are all over-compensating for something. Now, while I understand it, I don’t excuse it. They need to wake up and smell the roses and adhere to the will of the people as you are supposed to in a democracy.But through the continued lobbying of politicians and their parties, they continue to get what they want and will continue to do so until people wake up and have their voices drown out the donations of corporations, which is a very tall order.

Ron Paul is the one contender who has never changed his viewpoints for the sake of an audience. He doesn’t try to sugarcoat his message or dumb it down. He says what he believes in, and he says exactly what he will do once he’s in office. He’s not afraid to discuss any topic and give his own take on it. Agree with him, or disagree with him, it doesn’t matter. That’s the way a politician should act. That’s whats been missing from government for so long. I can’t ever remember a time (but I am only 26) where a politician was so candid, honest and even ready to admit his shortcomings.

Just read this open letter that Ron Paul wrote himself, and see for yourself how different a politician this man is from the rest of the crowd. Then check out the funny video of the Daily Shows take on the media ignoring Ron Paul.

I am inspired by the Occupy Wall St movement that has cropped up while I have written this blog post. I only hope that it doesn’t get hijacked by other parties with their own interests at heart, much like the tea party was in its infancy a few years ago. The founder of the tea party disavowed the party saying that it had been hijacked, read the following quote:

“It began as a movement to take back the United States from corrupt politicians. The Tea Party movement has been hijacked by Republicans and is now all about guns, gods and gays. Karl Denninger of The Market Ticker was one of the original founders of the Tea Party and calls the direction of the group an absolute joke.” – Karl Denninger

What does the future hold? Does Ron Paul stand a chance, or will a dim-witted talking points politician again take the reins of the Presidency, and democracy wither away ever more? I would like to hear other people’s opinion on this, leave a comment and lets gets a good discussion going.

Until next week.

What Industries Has The iPad Disrupted?

Ever since the iPad came out, entire industries have been shaken, stirred and disrupted. Some of these industries will be completely different in a few years, some might go under and some still might survive in limited ways. I wanted to see how many industries I could think up that were disrupted by the iPad. A little exercise in racking the brain.

The first industry that came to my mind was Magazines. I myself have an iPad, and the Zinio app which is remarkable. All your previous magazines that you used to buy at the News Agency or Bookstore, are now online. I’m not sure if all of them are electronically available, but the major ones are there, and there are hundreds to choose from. National Geographic, Time, Popular Science & Mechanics and so on and forth. In a few years, there might be no such thing as hard copy magazines, except as collectors items. Book stores are going to take a hit, as well as news agencies. Book stores are also being assaulted by the Kindle.

Web browsing is going through a large transition now as more and more web pages are viewed on mobile devices like the iPad. After the iPad was released, and started selling tens of millions of units, the netbook category took a nose dive in the amount of units sold. It seems as if people were choosing between a netbook and an iPad. At the end of the day, they seem to go after the same market. Neither of these two devices are supposed to be a primary device. They are mainly for content consumption instead of creation. Choosing between a cheap plastic, overly cramped keyboard with an operating system that makes tortoises seem to move fast, and a slick aluminium, thin designed piece of hardware with a custom made OS designed to leverage the hardware. It’s almost a no brainer. The iPad will win almost every time, provided the end user can afford it of course. The cheapest iPad is usually more expensive then the majority of net books. I sit here myself typing out this blog post on an iPad 2.

As we transition to an increasingly electronic society, is the demise of newspapers. There are thousands of apps on the App Store, for both the iPad and the iPhone to deliver news content in personalised, or generalised formats. CNN, Fox News, The NY and LA Times all have apps to deliver news directly to mobile users. Come a few years from now, maybe a decade or so and I wouldn’t be surprised to see that newspapers are gone altogether and we receive our news completely electronically via mobile devices, tablets and our computers. Journalism by any case will not become less important, but it may become much more competitive as the time between event and news story becomes ever smaller. Competitiveness in an industry that requires truth and honesty is not a good thing in my opinion. People start to take shortcuts. So it remains to be seen how that will play out. I sure do hope I’m wrong.

There is also a brand new type of app that has the potential to wreak much havoc almost everywhere, the Augmented Reality App. These type of apps have the potential to displace or make irrelevant many travel apps, as just the first example that came to my head. I’m sure other more imaginative people can think of more industries these type of apps will disrupt. I travel regularly, I’ve visited 23 countries, and well over 100 cities. There was a time when to travel somewhere, and really know the lay of the land. You either had to have a friend give you all the tips, before the web you had books like the Lonely Planet series, or you checked wikitravel.org (That’s what I do) or various other websites. But with an iPad or iPhone, you can download augmented reality travel apps that use your GPS position, camera, axis tilt and other sensory information to tell you the closet landmarks, show you pictures, how popular they are, the route to get there via walking, car or public transportation. You can decide before you have exerted any energy whether to go check it out or not. Its incredibly useful and saves you lots of time, in the pre-planning stages, and while on the ground. Just pack your stuff, download the app, and once you get there, load up the app and decide what you want to do. I have used these types of apps in Greece, Spain and Italy. Makes travelling a much more pleasant experience.

As more and more time goes on, I imagine more industries are going to become disrupted by the iPad and other tablets. Hulu is just hitting its stride, and it can do to movies and TV what Apple did to music, or the rumored Apple TV next year might usurp it.

At the end of the day, I think this is all a good thing. There will be job losses, and I feel for those people but the more electronic we make things, the more energy and greener we become. Besides, the people who are in the above fields are usually highly educated folk, and shouldn’t have much trouble finding a new job. But pain is the name of the game when it comes to change, I don’t think there is anyway to avoid it except to get through it as fast as possible.

Here’s to a rational future!

Here’s Hoping to Jobs Becoming Obsolete Quickly

Before jumping to judgment, let me explain why I hope that jobs soon become obsolete. A trend is occurring that has never before happened in human history. First let’s go over some history, for all of human history, we have had to work to survive, just as all other animals also do. Whether that meant hunting for food, then tending to crops, then trading for goods / food and so on and so forth until we find ourselves in the present day working 9 to 5 and the variety of other jobs that are to be found, some lucky and more still unlucky.

During this trend, a mini trend has progressed simultaneously; the amount of man-hours worked against productivity or work done. Up until the industrial revolution, a span of some 6,900 years, this ratio stayed fairly constant. That is, the amount of man hours vs work done didn’t change, it was about 2000 calories of work per person per day. Also that is the average amount of energy a person needs daily to sustain themselves, that number wasn’t arrived at by coincidence. Of course, civilisation prospered in some cases and there was still progress.This gradual incline was due to slavery, a moral black mark in our history, and all those extra hands were able to carry out all that extra work such as building Rome and other cities of antiquity.

Then the industrial revolution happened in the late 19th century, and the ratio start positively increasing. That is, the same or less man hours constituted increased productivity or work done. This was of course due to the machines and industrial processes that we started creating; steam engines, coal plants, light bulbs and factories that allowed us to work at the same output, but with improved effectiveness / efficiency. This trend, the same amount of man-hours and improved productivity is responsible for everything we have today. Technology started replacing human labour and this trend has continued to this day allowing us to have that little thing called comfort, and unhindered it will continue to progress further; we went from manual labour farming with horse-drawn ploughs to tractors that could allow 1 farmer to do the work of 10 men in a fraction of the time as just one example.

This positive increase (or reversing depending on the way you look at it) has an unintended consequence. People have been losing their jobs for the past 130 odd years as machines have replaced their profession. From the elevator man, to the soot shoveler on coal trains, to auto-workers et al. We are going through an epoch unseen before in human history. We are in the midst of transitioning from a manual labour society (circa 1850), to an increasingly machine-operated society today. We have still not passed all the way through, because as is plainly obvious we still have billions of people working, and many of them struggling to make a living, but it is undeniable.

The reasons for the increasing mechanization in society are simple. It costs much less to have a machine do a persons work. There is no health insurance bills, sick leave, vacation days and various other factors that influence productivity. The main rationale used to replace a person is to improve a company’s profit margin and time to market, the first of which is a very important factor in the progression of free market societies, only when people and companies have excess capital, or savings can new technologies, processes, products be created, used and consumed to advance the human race. In the past however, as people have become displaced from one profession, they have moved to other professions that could not be automated or that were created as new technologies were created. In the 20th century, as manufacturing jobs starting becoming replaced, then auto-workers et al, these persons moved en masse into the services sector. For the last 50 odd years, the services sector has exploded, most notable in the USA, but also in much of the developing world. However, the services sector is starting to bloat, and it simply cannot absorb the mass numbers anymore. Parallel to this, the wheels seem to be coming off the major world economies, and millions of jobs have been lost since the global financial crisis occurred in 2008. This is putting the squeeze to companies who now see automation as a way to reduce costs and thus improve profit margins.

It’s actually quite ironic, the reasons for the increasing mechanisation of manual labour are because it is cost-effective compared to a living breathing person. The irony in this is that as more and more people are laid off, replaced by machines, the less products in the long run the company can sell. For a period of time, the company might improve its profit margins as the rest of society hasn’t yet succumbed to the transitionary period. But eventually, as more and more of society’s jobs are automated, and eventually it will happen. All this automation removes the employees as consumers from the market, and in a free market, employees and consumers are interchangeable, they are both one and the same. These former employees will no longer have the earnings to buy these increasingly mechanised products or services. Thus, we will reach a point where we can produce almost everything via automation and there will be no one to buy them. To buy, you must first earn.

What is going to happen to the millions of factory workers when 3D printing becomes affordable and the plants start closing down? To miners when nanotechnology is finalised and we can turn garbage into food, metals and anything we can dream of to build anything we can imagine? Or to farmers when we start growing our food underground in luminescent rooms allowing good to grow at a fraction of the time needed above ground, and then to the fertilizer / pesticide companies whom we will have no more use of as we move our food production underground out of the reach of insects and no longer in need of soil, but a nutrient rich water feed instead. These are all questions we need to be answering now instead of when the time comes.

On the flip side, the costs of many services and products will continue dropping until [hopefully] they hit zero. Once we are almost to that point, we as a species will have a choice to make. Transition to a resource based economy where people are simply given what they need to survive, and perhaps more at no cost since everything can be produced for free or very close to it. Or, and in my opinion the more likely choice, the upper echelon who are narrowly short-sighted to their own benefit invent some other form of currency and keep the charade going convincing us that it is a necessary function of society to have government and classes to function. Think of the movie ‘In Time’, and you will get an idea. (Youtube Link)

Transitions are always painful, we as a species don’t deal well with change. That’s why we end up in societal systems far longer than we should, that’s why history repeats itself with dictators, tyrants, monarchies, and republics of the people which always end up serving the state first, the people maybe, later with war after war needlessly conducted to the detriment of the people. Much easier to be fooled in going back to the past instead of advancing into the unknown. However, this time we have an alternative, once we arrive at that critical point in time, we will have the ability to free everyone from the confines of manual labour and mindless work (mindless work, not work such as engineering, art and other such things that require human creativity) and set everyone free. We will be able to truly provide everyone on this sweet little blue planet with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and not just have them as words on paper.

I can’t wait for this day to happen and that we make the right choice, and I hope the transition is quick. There is a lot of unnecessary pain and suffering in this world today, and I expect that unfortunately there will be much more before this transition is over, and more still if we collectively make the wrong choice, However, the pain of this transition done right, will be much less than the pain of stopping, or rolling back the wheels of the future.

Below is an article written by CNN on which I have based this blog post. We differ on the end result and perhaps some of the middle ground, but not in the monumental change that is to come. Money will be a thing of the past one day soon, and we will have to come up with a more equitable and less wasteful way of distributing goods and food around the planet. Here is to the future, and to the abolishment of human suffering once and for all. We can only dream for now, but the future is fast upon us. Without knowledge, wisdom and a steady resolve, we can’t push into the future for there will always be those holding us back.

Are jobs obsolete? – CNN.com